Showing posts with label UFT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UFT. Show all posts

Thursday, October 08, 2009

"Mr. President...


...you will be elected by only about 25% of the membership. Isn't that a bad thing?"

What I was hoping to hear in response at the "Meet the President" dinner in Chinatown last week was... "You are right, John. It's not a good thing and this union (UFT) has to do something about member apathy and low participation in union elections. Let's put together a study group." That's what Randi Weingarten would have said anyway.

But instead I got the old- Whatta gonna do??? Michael Mulgrew asked the crowd, "How many of you get more than 50% at your chapter elections?" Some hands went up (obviously they missed their cue). He was resigned to the fact that dismal member turnout (about 30%) for union-wide elections was a problem beyond our control.

Some would argue it's by design. That the Unity Caucus, the political machine that runs the UFT, doesn't want broader participation. Otherwise, their candidates might not get elected.

But, Mulgrew assured us we are a democratic union. After all, the membership was surveyed about what their concerns were about the contract. That information was passed to a member negotiation committee. Nothing wrong with that. But, it seems the UFT did this the last time and the union was quietly running focus groups on the new contract while the negotiating committee was toiling away in the dark (unaware that a deal had been cut for a renewal of the 2005 contract with money between 6 and 8 percent). I know. I was in one of those focus groups. So was a surprised member of the negotiating committee.

This brings up the question: Why doesn't the UFT endorse Thompson for mayor? Instead, it is all very quiet. Was there a deal already cut by Randi on her way down to Washington with King Michael Bloomberg? We won't oppose you if...

One thing is for sure, they won't come to our school for a focus group anytime soon. At least we have better member participation in our school elections.


Monday, December 25, 2006

A Primer on Mayoral Control of NYC Schools– Where Dictatorship Trumps Democracy



In NYC it has been a corporate-style takeover; with wiping the slate clean (of personnel they could fire) and starting from scratch. It was recless without regard for human relations, insitutuional memory and professional communities long in place. If you were part of the past system you had nothing to offer and needed to be expunged. This is Mayor Bloomberg and Chancellor Klien's "Zero Year".

Chancellor Joel Klein also used public relations techniques with those he couldn’t outright dismiss. He visited our school, Murry Bergtraum High School, shortly after regime change in 2001 with a “town hall meeting”. It was run Bush-style, no questions taking by the Chancellor; one-way communications. Then they broke up the meeting into focus groups of parents and teachers. In these breakout sessions DOE underlings listened and took notes like they were interested in what we had to say. Nothing ever came of our comments; no analysis or reporting back. It’s like they took our feedback, and with our backs turned, chucked it into the garbage.

Things have been run that way ever since. Principals now look over their shoulders in fear, as managers do in the corporate world, for who is going to get the axe next. Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Klein have a mechanistic and reductionist view of education. That is, you can micromanage and script teachers, whose measure of success can totally be assessed by the standardized test scores of their students. There has been mass demoralization of educators, while parental involvement in activities in our school has plummeted.

Such management style comes from the Theory X view of human motivation you will find in the organizational theory literature. In the early 20th century a social scientist named Taylor developed a theory premised on the belief that workers were basically lazy and stupid. They responded only to external motivations- rewards or punishments. Hence we have the mayor’s “merit pay” for teachers and “accountability” for students that makes learning not fun but serious business, supporting the “feel bad” education environment. Why else would Klein recruit the likes of Jack Welch, the former CEO of General Electric, who boasted of creating a climate of fear for his employees, to set the standard of leadership for the DOE’s principals' institute? Mayor Bloomberg demonstrated just how committed he was to an openness to ideas by creating the Panel for Educational Policy, only to fire some of them when they were going to rule against his anti-social promotion scheme. That’s the kind of bureaucracy management we used to see in the old Soviet Union and dovetails with the poisonous pedagogy of the No Child Left Behind Act. At least with the old Board of Education, there were some members you could reach and convince to advocate for your school or a special program you were involved in. They didn't view veteran teachers a pariahs but conveyers of experience and institutional memory. Now there’s an unaccountable corporate bureaucracy in the DOE, wanting to implement the Zero Year.

On the other side of the spectrum Theory Y states that people have an inherent tendency for growth and creativity. This theory came out of the humanist school of psychology. It’s the premise this teacher operates on in his class. Democracy is taught as a value in and of itself; that the exercise of freedom allows one to create meaning and engage in and shape societal change as a natural right. The primary accountability is to oneself, premised on the view of Socrates that, “The unexamined life is not worth living.”

Only an educational system true to the ideals of democracy, where individuals take responsibility for their freedom; to learn what they will and how they will, with the guidance of a teacher who has only the student’s interest in mind, not a salary increase, can serve a free society. Such a system will put the students, teachers, parents and local administrators as equal partners in the driver’s seat with the standards of success to be determined by and for the these stakeholders.

Albert Einstein, a charter member of the American Federation of Teachers, said, “It’s the supreme art of the teacher to awaken joy in creative expression and knowledge.” Einstein had the audacity to consider that the motivation for learning could be intrinsic and that teachers should become expert at nudging it and creating opportunities for such joy to come alive and grow. Our educational systems must become democratic and not remain bureaucratic to nurture such joy. Corporate dictatorial bureaucracy is to joy of learning as a straight jacket is to dance. Bloomberg's experiement is a failure, it's time for something different.

John Elfrank-Dana
UFT Chapter Leader
Murry Bergtraum High School
http://www.elfrank.com/